Investing Information

Reading Between The Lines In Annual Proxy Statements





Upper Saddle River, N.J. - May 11, 2005 - Now that a large number of the proxy statements for public companies with fiscal years ending December 31, 2004 have been issued, those of us that scrutinize them for a living, as well as those that have invested in those companies, have an opportunity to analyze their executive pay packages in detail. With all of the attention on Corporate Governance and how to improve the level of transparency and insure that a strong relationship exists between pay and performance, these statements provide for interesting reading.

Many comb through these filings with the intent of learning if the compensation is reflective of the recent trends towards "pay-for-performance". In reality, does the compensation accurately reflect the company's financial performance? And does it make sense? We also are interested in learning how companies are reacting to the recent and anticipated changes in tax, accounting rules, and related legislation and the extent to which those changes are affecting executive compensation design.

With this in mind, we have been reading various recent filings, which when analyzed, still leaves some doubt if the companies are being as open and straight forward as we have all hoped for. Unfortunately, there is still a tendency for companies to use ambiguous, unclear language. In some instances, the linkage to performance is still questionable. The key is to read what has been presented in a very careful way, taking into consideration what is said, and in some instances, what is not said. Some examples from a recent proxy issued by a large company provide evidence of why it is important to read and interpret them very carefully:

"Our policy is to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation payments to (Top Management) under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder (Section 162(m)). Our shareholders have approved our incentive plans designed and administered to qualify compensation awarded thereunder as "performance-based". We may, however, authorize payments to (Top Management) that may not be fully deductible if we believe such payments are in our shareholders' interests."

This means that the programs are in compliance with the Internal Revenue Code 162(m); however, and it is a big HOWEVER, they may not qualify for exemption under the one million dollar cap, and therefore would not be deductible for tax purposes. We find it quite a stretch to see how that is in the shareholder's interest, since a non-deductible expense reduces the company's profitability.

"(Top Management) pay is compared to (Key Sales Management) pay to ensure appropriate internal relationships are achieved."

While internal equity and hierarchical relationships are important in this company's situation, Key Sales Management consists of some very highly compensated sales types that may actually push up the Top Management pay, if the company tries to maintain internal equity. The reality is that top salespeople/producers can make huge amounts, but it is based on their individual performance achievement, and therefore it may be more than the amount that would be paid to corporate officers. Trying to maintain an artificial differential may therefore not be warranted, nor in the best interests of the shareholders.

"(The CEO) participates in several defined benefit pension plans, including some unfunded executive plans?.The amount estimated?.is?.not subject to deductions for Social Security or other offset amounts."

Most large companies have some form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP), which provides non-qualified retirement benefits that are over and above those allowed by government regulations. The standard in designing these plans, which are typically very generous and have a time rather than performance commitment, is that other company-sponsored retirement programs, 401(k) matches, and Social Security would offset the benefits that are provided. Although in the scheme of things, the lack of an offset to these extra benefits may not be a large cost, it is still a hidden extra benefit that should be quantified and disclosed.

"As described above, in contrast to compensation in prior fiscal years, we did not ascribe a value to (the CEO's) restricted stock units based on a 25% discount from fair market value of the common stock to compensate for the vesting characteristics and transfer restrictions on the restricted stock units."

At first read, this seems to make sense, but after multiple readings, we still aren't sure what this means; have the restricted shares been discounted or not? This is an example of ambiguous and confusing language, which companies should work to avoid.

The bottom line is that while many companies are becoming better and more open at responding to regulatory and shareholder demands within their public disclosures, more work is necessary to have complete transparency. In the meantime, let the reader be wary.

Compensation Resources, Inc. provides compensation and human resource consulting to mid-size and Fortune 500 clients as well as public, private, family-owned and emerging companies. CRI specializes in Executive Compensation, Salary Administration, Performance Management, Sales Compensation, and expert witness services. Our reference library boasts over 4,800 surveys.


MORE RESOURCES:

Merck Investors Can Sleep Easier (Not Easy)
DailyFinance
By Brian Orelli, The Motley Fool Posted 3:34PM 02/06/12 Investing Merck (NYS: MRK) said today that its insomnia drug suvorexant had passed two phase 3 trials, putting it on track for an FDA filing this year. But that doesn't mean investors can sleep ...

and more »


Investments for Income Lovers
Motley Fool
With interest rates at historical lows, folks are having a hard time squeezing any meaningful income out of their investments. While you don't want to go out too far on a limb in search of higher yields, there are some steps you can take to boost your ...

and more »


Your Most Important Investing Decision of the Next 10 Years
TheStreet.com
And these are some of the most boring companies you can think of -- real-state investment trusts (REITs), pipeline operators and cigarette makers. But they all have one thing in common. As the chief investment strategist behind High-Yield Investing, ...

and more »


Ask the Experts: What looks attractive for investors?
Kansas City Star
By CLAUDIA BUCK With the economy starting to perk up, investors are wondering where they should be looking next. Here with some recommendations is Glenn Kenes, managing director of investments with Barber-Kenes Capital Management Group in Auburn, ...

and more »


J.D. Power and Associates Recognizes Merrill Edge(R) Call Centers for Customer ...
MarketWatch (press release)
For customers who prefer to invest on their own, Merrill Edge provides an online self-directed investing platform, with robust tools and resources to help them make informed investment decisions. "This designation acknowledges the strong commitment ...

and more »


Investing mistakes even the pros make
Sydney Morning Herald
The best investors learn from their mistakes over time. And because I've made plenty of mistakes during my career, I'll optimistically say that means I've had lots of room for personal growth. Lucky you, then, for being able to learn from some of the ...

and more »


TD Ameritrade Investor Poll: Younger Investors More Likely to Invest "More" in ...
MarketWatch (press release)
OMAHA, Neb., Feb 06, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The European debt crisis, US unemployment, the housing market, and political uncertainty - a laundry list of issues that may be causing investors to think more cautiously about their financial futures.

and more »


3 Dow Stocks That Jumped in a Down Market
DailyFinance
By Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool Posted 7:06PM 02/06/12 Investing The stock market may have been down today, but things could have been worse. After falling nearly 70 points in early trading, the Dow Jones Industrials (INDEX: ^DJI) recovered to finish ...
Investing In The Dogs Of The DowSeeking Alpha

all 12 news articles »


Stockopedia

Are your investments at risk? 3 useful Red Flags: Altman, Beneish and Piotroski
Stockopedia
Warren Buffett's rule #1 of investing is “Don't Lose Money" while rule #2 is “Don't forget rule #1.” As with most Buffet aphorisms, though, the devil is in the detail of implementation. Clearly, though, one important way to prevent yourself losing ...

and more »


Freedom Investing 2012
Forbes
I've been discussing foreign freedom investing for a decade now. In the spring of 2010, I used the term “Ring-of-Fire” to describe countries with a high debt and deficit and suggested avoiding them. A year later, I revisited that advice and counseled ...

and more »

Google News

Improve your credit  the home owner loan  Stock4Profit  Best Investing Guide  Credit Card and Mortgage  
Free Links Direct
Cheap Flights - Over 1,200 Destinations Worldwide
Cheap flights to New YorkCheap flights to DubaiCheap flights to Bangkok
Cheap flights to OrlandoCheap flights to Las VegasCheap flights to Sydney
Home | Site Map | The Investment Machine | real estate investing | stock market investing | stock market | investing strategy | stock investing | investing in | invest | stock |
© 2007